cashier: have expensive checks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have expensive checks 1.00
have checks 0.95
on checks 0.94
has check 0.82
be safe check 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cashier, have checks)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cashier, have checks)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cashier, on checks)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cashier, have checks)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cashier, on checks)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cashier, on checks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cashier, has check)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cashier, has check)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cashier, has check)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cashier, be safe check)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cashier, be safe check)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cashier, be safe check)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cashier, on checks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be safe check)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cashier, has check)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)