cashier: pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay 1.00
is pay 0.99
get paid 0.88
get paid little 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cashier, pay)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cashier, is pay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid little)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cashier, is pay)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cashier, is pay)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cashier, get paid little)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cashier, get paid little)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cashier, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cashier, get paid little)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cashier, is pay)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cashier, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cashier, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cashier, pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)