cashier: short his customer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, people
Weight: 0.55
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, grocery store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, supermarket
Weight: 0.34
, food store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
short his customer 1.00
short customer 0.97
change customer 0.84
offer to customer 0.82
serve customer 0.82
serve customer in restaurant 0.80
bring food to customer 0.80
short change you 0.78
thank customer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(waiter, offer to customer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(waiter, bring food to customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, serve customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(waiter, offer to customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(waiter, offer to customer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cashier, short his customer)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cashier, short customer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short customer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cashier, change customer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cashier, short customer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cashier, short customer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cashier, change customer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cashier, change customer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cashier, short change you)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short change you)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cashier, thank customer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, change customer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cashier, short change you)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cashier, thank customer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cashier, thank customer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cashier, short change you)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cashier, thank customer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, short his customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short his customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(waiter, offer to customer)