castle: be built in forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built in forests 1.00
were built near rivers 0.79
be built on hills 0.79
get built on hills 0.79
were built on hills 0.78
were first built of wood 0.77
were built in places 0.75
is built 0.75
be built in sea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(castle, be built in forests)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(landmark, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(castle, be built in forests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(landmark, is built)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(landmark, is built)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be built in sea)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, is built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(castle, be built in forests)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(landmark, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(castle, be built in forests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lighthouse, be built in sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, be built in sea)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(buckingham palace, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(buckingham palace, is built)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lighthouse, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(castle, be built in forests)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(castle, were built near rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(castle, were built near rivers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(castle, were built near rivers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(castle, were built near rivers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(castle, were built on hills)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(castle, were built on hills)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(castle, were built on hills)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(castle, is built)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(castle, were built on hills)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(castle, were first built of wood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(castle, get built on hills)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(castle, is built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(castle, is built)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(castle, were first built of wood)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(castle, were first built of wood)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(castle, were first built of wood)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(castle, get built on hills)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(castle, is built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(castle, be built in forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(landmark, is built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lighthouse, be built in sea)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(buckingham palace, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lighthouse, is built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(castle, be built in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(landmark, is built)