castle: get built on hills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get built on hills 1.00
be built on hills 0.99
were built on hills 0.98
be on hills 0.93
be built on hill 0.90
were built on hillside 0.88
were built near cliffs 0.86
were built on bends of rivers on cliffs 0.83
be built on rocks 0.83
were built on bends on cliffs 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be built on rocks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(lighthouse, be built on rocks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, be built on rocks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(castle, get built on hills)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(castle, were built on hills)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(castle, were built on hills)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(castle, were built on hills)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(castle, were built on hills)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(castle, be built on hill)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(castle, be built on hill)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(castle, be built on hill)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(castle, be built on hill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(castle, get built on hills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, get built on hills)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lighthouse, be built on rocks)