castle: were ataked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were attaked 1.00
were ataked 1.00
were ddefended 1.00
were made 0.88
were important in 1870 0.87
were used for defence 0.87
were needed 0.83
were in times 0.83
were where 0.83
were stop 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(castle, were ataked)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(castle, were ddefended)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(castle, were attaked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(castle, were ddefended)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(castle, were ddefended)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(castle, were made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(castle, were ddefended)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(castle, were attaked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(castle, were needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(castle, were made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(castle, were needed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(castle, were attaked)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attaked)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(castle, were made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(castle, were made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(castle, were needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(castle, were ataked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(castle, were ataked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(castle, were ataked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lighthouse, were important in 1870)