castle: were attacked in 1066

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were attacked in 1066 1.00
were attacked 1.00
were attacked in times 0.96
were attacked in ages 0.90
were attacked by by ages 0.89
were attacked in 12 century 0.89
were attacked in medieval times 0.88
were attacked in middle ages 0.87
were attacked by by middle ages 0.87
was when bombed 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was when bombed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(buckingham palace, was when bombed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(buckingham palace, was when bombed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(castle, were attacked in 1066)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(castle, were attacked)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(castle, were attacked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked in middle ages)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(castle, were attacked in middle ages)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(castle, were attacked in middle ages)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked in middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked in 1066)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(buckingham palace, was when bombed)