castle: were protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were protected 1.00
were well protected 0.95
were in ages protected 0.88
were in middle ages protected 0.85
protect people 0.79
is preserved 0.77
were surrounded by water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(structure, is preserved)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(castle, were protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(structure, is preserved)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, is preserved)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(structure, is preserved)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(castle, were protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(castle, were protected)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castle, were well protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(castle, were well protected)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, protect people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(castle, were surrounded by water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(castle, were well protected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(castle, protect people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(castle, were surrounded by water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(castle, were well protected)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(castle, were surrounded by water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(castle, protect people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(castle, were surrounded by water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(castle, protect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(castle, were protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(castle, were protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is preserved)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(castle, were protected)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is preserved)