cat: has physical part claws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, dog
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings tabby cat
Weight: 0.80
, black cat
Weight: 0.79
, tiger
Weight: 0.73
, siamese
Weight: 0.71
, kitten
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part claws 1.00
has physical part whiskers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part claws)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part claws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cat, has physical part claws)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part claws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)