cat: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, feline
Weight: 0.71
, dog
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings tabby cat
Weight: 0.80
, black cat
Weight: 0.79
, tiger
Weight: 0.73
, siamese
Weight: 0.71
, kitten
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
is better pets 0.92
be good pets to people 0.92
be different as pets 0.92
is popular pets 0.92
is house pets 0.91
be popular as pets 0.91
is best pets 0.91
make good pets 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kitten, make pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(kitten, make pets)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(kitten, make pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(cat, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, make pets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(cat, make pets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, make pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cat, make pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(kitten, make pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cat, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)