catabolism: be vs metabolism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metabolism
Weight: 0.43
, tissue
Weight: 0.35
, process
Weight: 0.29
Siblings endocrine system
Weight: 0.29
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.29
, glycolysis
Weight: 0.29
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.29
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs metabolism 1.00
is metabolism 0.92
be vs gluconeogenesis 0.89
be common in metabolism 0.89
be vs catabolism 0.88
be vs anabolism 0.88
have advantage over metabolism 0.87
have advantage over anaerobic metabolism 0.85
be common in aerobic metabolism 0.85
be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glycolysis, be common in aerobic metabolism)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(glycolysis, be vs gluconeogenesis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(glycolysis, be vs gluconeogenesis)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(glycolysis, be vs gluconeogenesis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(glycolysis, be common in aerobic metabolism)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(glycolysis, be common in aerobic metabolism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(catabolism, be vs metabolism)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(catabolism, is metabolism)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is metabolism)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is metabolism)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs catabolism)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs anabolism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs catabolism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(catabolism, is metabolism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs anabolism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(catabolism, be vs catabolism)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(catabolism, be vs catabolism)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(catabolism, be vs anabolism)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(catabolism, be vs anabolism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glycolysis, be vs gluconeogenesis)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(glycolysis, be common in aerobic metabolism)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(catabolism, be vs metabolism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)