cataract: be in eye form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in eye form 1.00
be present in people with dry eye 0.85
differ in eye 0.82
form 0.77
forms on edges of lens 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(condition, differ in eye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cataract, be in eye form)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(disease, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cataract, be in eye form)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(condition, differ in eye)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(disease, form)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(condition, differ in eye)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(disease, form)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be present in people with dry eye)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(condition, differ in eye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cataract, be in eye form)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(disease, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cataract, be in eye form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(glaucoma, be present in people with dry eye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be present in people with dry eye)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cataract, be in eye form)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cataract, form)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cataract, form)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cataract, form)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cataract, forms on edges of lens)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cataract, forms on edges of lens)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cataract, forms on edges of lens)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cataract, forms on edges of lens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cataract, be in eye form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(condition, differ in eye)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(disease, form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be present in people with dry eye)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(condition, differ in eye)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cataract, be in eye form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(disease, form)