cataract: be treated in medicine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated in medicine 1.00
be treated in alternative medicine 0.93
be treated by doctors 0.86
be treated 0.85
is treated 0.85
be viewed in chinese medicine 0.84
is medical 0.78
be due to acute salpingitis treated 0.78
is medical condition 0.77
were treated in ages 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(disease, is medical)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(disease, be treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(disease, is medical)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(disease, be treated)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(disease, is medical)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, is medical)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(disease, is medical)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(glaucoma, is medical)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, is medical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, is treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cataract, is treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(disease, is medical)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(glaucoma, is medical)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(disease, is medical)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(disease, be viewed in chinese medicine)