catcher: be in rye

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye 1.00
was in rye 0.99
be in rye called 0.99
be in rye good 0.98
be in rye bad 0.98
be in rye popular 0.97
be in rye famous 0.97
be in rye matter 0.97
be in rye significant 0.95
be in rye classic 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)