catcher: be in rye called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye called 1.00
be in rye 0.99
was in rye 0.99
be in rye good 0.98
be in rye bad 0.97
be in rye popular 0.97
be in rye famous 0.96
be in rye matter 0.96
be in rye significant 0.94
be in rye classic 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)