catcher: be in rye good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye good 1.00
be in rye bad 0.99
be in rye 0.98
be in rye called 0.98
was in rye 0.98
be in rye popular 0.97
be in rye matter 0.96
be in rye famous 0.96
be in rye significant 0.95
be in rye classic 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)