catcher: was in rye

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in rye 1.00
be in rye 0.99
be in rye called 0.99
be in rye good 0.98
be in rye bad 0.97
be in rye popular 0.97
be in rye famous 0.96
be in rye matter 0.96
be in rye significant 0.95
be in rye classic 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(catcher, was in rye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)