caterer: charge more for weddings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.61
, contractor
Weight: 0.59
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings baker
Weight: 0.33
, software company
Weight: 0.33
, hostess
Weight: 0.33
, landlord
Weight: 0.32
, architect
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge more for weddings 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(vendor, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(caterer, charge more for weddings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vendor, charge more for weddings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(vendor, charge more for weddings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(vendor, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(caterer, charge more for weddings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(caterer, charge more for weddings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(caterer, charge more for weddings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(caterer, charge more for weddings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vendor, charge more for weddings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(caterer, charge more for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vendor, charge more for weddings)