:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
do |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(caterer, do)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(contractor, do)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baker, do)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(caterer, do)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(baker, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(baker, do)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(caterer, do)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(caterer, do)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(baker, do)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(caterer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)