catering: is money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, department
Weight: 0.56
Siblings escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, bar service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is money 1.00
make money 0.94
be out of money 0.92
lose money 0.85
convert money to gold 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(service, be out of money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(catering, is money)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(catering, is money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(service, convert money to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(catering, is money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(service, be out of money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(service, lose money)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(service, convert money to gold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(service, lose money)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(service, convert money to gold)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(service, be out of money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(postal service, lose money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(service, be out of money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(catering, is money)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(catering, is money)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(service, convert money to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(catering, is money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(postal service, lose money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(postal service, lose money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(catering, is money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(catering, is money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(service, be out of money)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, lose money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(service, convert money to gold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(postal service, lose money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(service, be out of money)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, lose money)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(catering, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(service, convert money to gold)