catering: is wedding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, department
Weight: 0.56
Siblings escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, bar service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wedding 1.00
be at wedding 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at wedding)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(bar service, be at wedding)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at wedding)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(catering, is wedding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(catering, is wedding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(catering, is wedding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(catering, is wedding)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at wedding)