ccd: be better than film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.57
, electronic device
Weight: 0.56
, digital camera
Weight: 0.53
, organization
Weight: 0.45
Siblings xml
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.32
, pda
Weight: 0.32
, unix
Weight: 0.32
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than film 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ccd, be better than film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ccd, be better than film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ccd, be better than film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be better than film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ccd, be better than film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ccd, be better than film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)