ccd: be in church expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.57
, electronic device
Weight: 0.56
, digital camera
Weight: 0.53
, organization
Weight: 0.45
Siblings xml
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.32
, pda
Weight: 0.32
, unix
Weight: 0.32
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in church expensive 1.00
be in church 0.93
be in catholic church expensive 0.92
be in catholic church 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ccd, be in church expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be in catholic church expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ccd, be in catholic church expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ccd, be in catholic church expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be in church)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(ccd, be in church)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ccd, be in church)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be in catholic church)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ccd, be in catholic church)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ccd, be in catholic church)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ccd, be in catholic church expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ccd, be in church)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ccd, be in catholic church)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ccd, be in church expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ccd, be in church expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ccd, be in church expensive)