cedar: be bad for chickens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conifer
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.64
, wood
Weight: 0.63
, evergreen
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pine
Weight: 0.38
, juniper
Weight: 0.37
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37
, cypress
Weight: 0.37
, birch
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for chickens 1.00
be bad for rabbits 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cedar, be bad for chickens)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for chickens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for chickens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits)