cedar: be bad for rabbits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conifer
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.64
, wood
Weight: 0.63
, evergreen
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pine
Weight: 0.38
, juniper
Weight: 0.37
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37
, cypress
Weight: 0.37
, birch
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for rabbits 1.00
be bad for chickens 0.86
be toxic to snakes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for chickens)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cedar, be bad for chickens)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cedar, be bad for chickens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be toxic to snakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cedar, be toxic to snakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cedar, be toxic to snakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for chickens)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cedar, be toxic to snakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits)