:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(conifer, die)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cedar, die in bc)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(evergreen, die)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cedar, die in bc)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(evergreen, die)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(conifer, die)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, die)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(conifer, die)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(juniper, die)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(juniper, die)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(juniper, die)
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cedar, die in bc)
Similarity expansion
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cedar, die)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cedar, die)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cedar, die)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cedar, die in bc)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(evergreen, die)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(juniper, die)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(evergreen, die)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cedar, die in bc)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)