celebrity: be on dancing with stars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.58
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.73
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.68
, bob hope
Weight: 0.67
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on dancing with stars 1.00
be picked dancing with stars 0.94
be called stars 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(movie star, be called stars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(movie star, be called stars)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(movie star, be called stars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be picked dancing with stars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(celebrity, be picked dancing with stars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(celebrity, be picked dancing with stars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be picked dancing with stars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(celebrity, be called stars)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be called stars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(celebrity, be called stars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be called stars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be on dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(movie star, be called stars)