cell division: be important in eukaryotes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.67
, activity
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.62
, development
Weight: 0.60
, organism
Weight: 0.58
Siblings meiosis
Weight: 0.44
, cell signaling
Weight: 0.37
, mitosis
Weight: 0.37
, human cell
Weight: 0.37
, business activity
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in eukaryotes 1.00
be in eukaryotes 0.99
be in eukaryotes complex 0.96
be in eukaryotes more complex 0.95
be more complex in eukaryotes 0.95
differ in eukaryotes 0.95
be simpler than eukaryotes 0.91
be complicated in eukaryotic organisms 0.88
be important to multicellular organisms 0.87
be important to unicellular organisms 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cell division, differ in eukaryotes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cell division, be in eukaryotes more complex)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cell division, be in eukaryotes more complex)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cell division, be more complex in eukaryotes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cell division, differ in eukaryotes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cell division, differ in eukaryotes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cell division, be more complex in eukaryotes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in eukaryotes more complex)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cell division, be simpler than eukaryotes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cell division, be more complex in eukaryotes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cell division, be simpler than eukaryotes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cell division, be simpler than eukaryotes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be simpler than eukaryotes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotes more complex)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be more complex in eukaryotes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell division, differ in eukaryotes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell division, be important in eukaryotes)