cell division: be in human beings important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.67
, activity
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.62
, development
Weight: 0.60
, organism
Weight: 0.58
Siblings meiosis
Weight: 0.44
, mitosis
Weight: 0.37
, human cell
Weight: 0.37
, business activity
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in human beings important 1.00
be in human beings 0.99
be in beings important 0.97
be in beings 0.95
be important to animals 0.77
be important for animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mitosis, be important to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mitosis, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mitosis, be important to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cell division, be in human beings important)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cell division, be important to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cell division, be important for animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to animals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell division, be in human beings important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mitosis, be important to animals)