cell phone: be related to engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to engineering 1.00
be related to technology 0.81
be related 0.80
be related to math 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cellphone, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cell phone, be related to engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cell phone, be related to technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be related to technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cell phone, be related to math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to technology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be related to math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cellphone, be related)