cell phone: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(phone, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(phone, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(android, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cell phone, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cell phone, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cellphone, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)