cello: have thicker strings than violin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stringed instrument
Weight: 0.77
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
, classical music
Weight: 0.57
, piano
Weight: 0.53
Siblings violin
Weight: 0.43
, viola
Weight: 0.41
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.41
, harpsichord
Weight: 0.40
, clarinet
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thicker strings than violin 1.00
be better than violin 0.90
be easier than violin 0.89
have strings 0.87
be better than violins 0.87
be bigger than violins 0.87
be better than new violins 0.86
have 5 strings 0.86
be more popular than viola 0.85
have 3 strings 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(piano, have strings)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cello, have thicker strings than violin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(piano, have strings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(piano, have strings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(viola, be better than violin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(violin, be more popular than viola)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(viola, be easier than violin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(violin, have 5 strings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(viola, be bigger than violins)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(violin, be better than new violins)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(piano, have strings)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(viola, be better than violin)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(viola, be better than violin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(viola, be easier than violin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(viola, be easier than violin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(violin, be more popular than viola)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(violin, be more popular than viola)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(viola, be bigger than violins)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(viola, be bigger than violins)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(violin, be better than new violins)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(violin, be better than new violins)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(violin, have 5 strings)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(violin, have 5 strings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cello, have thicker strings than violin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cello, have thicker strings than violin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piano, have strings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(viola, be better than violin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(viola, be easier than violin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(violin, be more popular than viola)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(viola, be bigger than violins)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(violin, have 5 strings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(violin, be better than new violins)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piano, have strings)