cellphone: call landlines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.65
, cell phone
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular telephone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
call landlines 1.00
be better than landlines 0.97
be called cellphone 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than landlines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than landlines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than landlines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cellphone, call landlines)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be better than landlines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cellphone, be called cellphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be called cellphone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cellphone, be better than landlines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be called cellphone)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be better than landlines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cellphone, be called cellphone)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cellphone, be better than landlines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, call landlines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cellphone, call landlines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, call landlines)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than landlines)