cellphone: vibrate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.65
, cell phone
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular telephone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
vibrate 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cell phone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cellphone, vibrate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cell phone, vibrate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, vibrate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mobile, vibrate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cell phone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cellphone, vibrate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mobile, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mobile, vibrate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cellphone, vibrate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cellphone, vibrate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cell phone, vibrate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mobile, vibrate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(cellphone, vibrate)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cell phone, vibrate)