cellphone: were made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.65
, cell phone
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular telephone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were made 1.00
is made 0.91
were needed 0.79
were big at first 0.77
were really needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cell phone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cellphone, were made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cell phone, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, were made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cell phone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cellphone, were made)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cellphone, is made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cellphone, were needed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cellphone, is made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cellphone, is made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were big at first)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, is made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cellphone, were needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were really needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cellphone, were big at first)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were needed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cellphone, were really needed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were really needed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cellphone, were really needed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were big at first)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cellphone, were big at first)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cellphone, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cell phone, were made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cellphone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cell phone, were made)