cellular respiration: be chemically opposite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chemically opposite 1.00
be opposite 0.79
be opposite reactions 0.79
be opposite process 0.79
be opposite of photosynthesis 0.78
be opposite processes 0.78
is opposite processes 0.78
produce racemic mixtures 0.77
break down larger molecule 0.76
break down molecule 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digestion, break down larger molecule)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(digestion, break down larger molecule)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(digestion, break down larger molecule)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be opposite processes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be opposite)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be opposite)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be opposite)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be opposite processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be opposite processes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be opposite reactions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be opposite process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be opposite process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be opposite reactions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be opposite processes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be opposite process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be opposite reactions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be opposite)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be opposite reactions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be opposite process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be chemically opposite)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(digestion, break down larger molecule)