cellular respiration: be considered efficient process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered efficient process 1.00
is efficient process 0.97
is efficient 0.89
be considered process 0.89
is more efficient 0.89
be considered as energy life process 0.86
be called process 0.84
be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone 0.81
be more efficient than fermentation 0.81
be important for process of living things 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(metabolism, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metabolism, is more efficient)