cellular respiration: be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone 1.00
be more efficient than glycolysis 0.97
be more efficient than fermentation 0.84
is more efficient 0.84
be considered efficient process 0.81
is efficient 0.81
is efficient process 0.80
be more complex than carbohydrates 0.78
produce more atp than fermentation 0.78
be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(metabolism, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)