cellular respiration: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
has physical part processes 0.91
be called process 0.87
be considered process 0.85
be important for process of living things 0.83
be considered as energy life process 0.82
be concidered effiecent process 0.81
be considered efficient process 0.80
is efficient process 0.80
has physical part tissue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part processes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part processes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be concidered effiecent process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part processes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part processes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be called process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be concidered effiecent process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be concidered effiecent process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be concidered effiecent process)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important for process of living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has physical part process)