cellular respiration: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
is more efficient 0.97
is efficient process 0.92
be considered efficient process 0.89
be more efficient than glycolysis 0.83
be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone 0.81
be more efficient than fermentation 0.80
is inefficient 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pathway, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pathway, is inefficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(process, is inefficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pathway, is inefficient)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(process, is inefficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, is inefficient)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pathway, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(photosynthesis, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, is inefficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pathway, is inefficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, is inefficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(metabolism, is efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, is inefficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pathway, is inefficient)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, is inefficient)