cement: be stored on construction site

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.55
, sector
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings steel
Weight: 0.34
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.33
, petroleum
Weight: 0.33
, rubber
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stored on construction site 1.00
be used in construction 0.86
is building material 0.80
is good building material 0.78
be better than building materials 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(steel, be used in construction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(steel, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(steel, be used in construction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cement, be used in construction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cement, is building material)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cement, be used in construction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cement, be better than building materials)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cement, is building material)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cement, be better than building materials)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cement, be used in construction)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cement, is building material)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cement, is good building material)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cement, be better than building materials)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cement, is good building material)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cement, is good building material)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cement, is good building material)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cement, be better than building materials)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cement, be used in construction)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cement, is building material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cement, be stored on construction site)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cement, be stored on construction site)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(steel, be used in construction)