cemetery: have gates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents historical site
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.63
, site
Weight: 0.63
, property
Weight: 0.62
Siblings church
Weight: 0.66
, monument
Weight: 0.36
, graveyard
Weight: 0.35
, memorial
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have gates 1.00
is gates 0.99
have gates around them 0.94
have fences around them 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(graveyard, have gates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(graveyard, have gates)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(graveyard, have gates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cemetery, have gates)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cemetery, is gates)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cemetery, is gates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cemetery, have gates around them)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cemetery, is gates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, is gates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cemetery, have gates around them)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have gates around them)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cemetery, have gates around them)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cemetery, have fences around them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cemetery, have gates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have gates)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(graveyard, have gates)