centipede: be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, arthropod
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.61
, game
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.37
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.36
, frog
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter 1.00
live in leaf litter 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(centipede, live in leaf litter)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(centipede, live in leaf litter)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(centipede, live in leaf litter)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(centipede, live in leaf litter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(centipede, be helpful to woodlouse in leaf litter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(invertebrate, live in leaf litter)