centipede: has state pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, arthropod
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.61
, game
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.37
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.36
, frog
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pests 1.00
is insects 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, has state pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, is insects)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(caterpillar, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, has state pests)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(caterpillar, is insects)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, is insects)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(centipede, has state pests)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(centipede, is insects)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(centipede, is insects)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(centipede, is insects)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(centipede, is insects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(centipede, has state pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(caterpillar, is insects)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(centipede, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(caterpillar, has state pests)