central nervous system: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endocrine gland
Weight: 0.66
, organ
Weight: 0.65
, region
Weight: 0.64
, function
Weight: 0.64
, human body
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.60
, spine
Weight: 0.57
, spinal column
Weight: 0.56
, cerebellum
Weight: 0.51
, neuron
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
has quality difference 0.77
has quality function 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(organ, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(organ, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(spine, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(spine, feel good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(spine, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(central nervous system, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality worse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(central nervous system, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spine, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)