central park: be called park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.89
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, location
Weight: 0.71
, landmark
Weight: 0.70
, center
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.42
, national park
Weight: 0.41
, national parks
Weight: 0.39
, amusement park
Weight: 0.38
, city
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called park 1.00
be called central park 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be called central park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(central park, be called park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be called central park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be called central park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be called central park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(central park, be called park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(central park, be called park)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(central park, be called central park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(central park, be called central park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(central park, be called central park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(central park, be called central park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(central park, be called park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(central park, be called park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be called central park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(central park, be called park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be called central park)