ceo: is highly paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is highly paid 1.00
is paid 0.82
is paid high 0.82
get paid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(executive, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(executive, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(executive, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(executive, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ceo, is highly paid)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ceo, is paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ceo, is paid high)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid high)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ceo, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceo, get paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ceo, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid high)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)