ceo: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid high 0.92
is highly paid 0.82
get paid 1 dollar 0.82
deserve pay 0.79
pay themselves 0.78
earn money 0.77
be paid in stock options 0.76
is overpaid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(executive, is overpaid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(executive, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(executive, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(executive, is overpaid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(executive, is overpaid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(executive, get paid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(executive, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(executive, is overpaid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ceo, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ceo, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ceo, is paid high)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceo, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ceo, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid high)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ceo, is paid high)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ceo, get paid 1 dollar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid high)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ceo, is highly paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ceo, deserve pay)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ceo, pay themselves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ceo, be paid in stock options)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ceo, deserve pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceo, pay themselves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ceo, get paid 1 dollar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceo, get paid 1 dollar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(ceo, is overpaid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ceo, earn money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ceo, pay themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get paid 1 dollar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is highly paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ceo, be paid in stock options)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ceo, is highly paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ceo, is highly paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is overpaid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ceo, earn money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ceo, be paid in stock options)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ceo, earn money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ceo, is overpaid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceo, be paid in stock options)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is overpaid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ceo, earn money)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ceo, pay themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(executive, is overpaid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ceo, is paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(executive, is overpaid)