ceo: quit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
quit 1.00
resign 0.84
resign after scandal 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(founder, quit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(director, resign)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(founder, quit)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(founder, quit)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(director, resign)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(director, resign)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ceo, quit)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ceo, resign)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ceo, resign)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ceo, resign after scandal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ceo, resign)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ceo, resign after scandal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, resign)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ceo, resign after scandal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ceo, resign after scandal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceo, quit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ceo, quit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(founder, quit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceo, quit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(director, resign)