cephalopod: be considered mollusks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, mollusk
Weight: 0.54
, fish
Weight: 0.49
, organism
Weight: 0.47
, crustacean
Weight: 0.46
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.66
, octopus
Weight: 0.37
, arthropod
Weight: 0.34
, gastropod
Weight: 0.34
, squid
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mollusks 1.00
is mollusks 0.98
is advanced mollusks 0.93
is most advanced mollusks 0.92
be systems unique among mollusks 0.90
be nervous systems unique among mollusks 0.86
is invertebrates 0.80
be considered intelligent of invertebrates 0.78
be considered most intelligent of invertebrates 0.78
species 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(crustacean, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(crustacean, is invertebrates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, is invertebrates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is invertebrates)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(crustacean, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arthropod, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is invertebrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arthropod, species)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(arthropod, species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cephalopod, is mollusks)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, is mollusks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, is most advanced mollusks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cephalopod, is mollusks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, is mollusks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, is advanced mollusks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be systems unique among mollusks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be nervous systems unique among mollusks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cephalopod, is invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cephalopod, is advanced mollusks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cephalopod, species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered intelligent of invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered most intelligent of invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, is invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, is advanced mollusks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cephalopod, is invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, is invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cephalopod, be considered intelligent of invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cephalopod, is advanced mollusks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cephalopod, be considered most intelligent of invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cephalopod, is most advanced mollusks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cephalopod, be systems unique among mollusks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cephalopod, species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cephalopod, be nervous systems unique among mollusks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be considered intelligent of invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be systems unique among mollusks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be considered most intelligent of invertebrates)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, is most advanced mollusks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be nervous systems unique among mollusks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be systems unique among mollusks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered intelligent of invertebrates)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered most intelligent of invertebrates)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cephalopod, is most advanced mollusks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be nervous systems unique among mollusks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(crustacean, is invertebrates)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mollusk, is invertebrates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(arthropod, is invertebrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(arthropod, species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(crustacean, is invertebrates)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cephalopod, be considered mollusks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mollusk, is invertebrates)